My list of effective altruism ideas that seem to be underexplored

The article: “My list of effective altruism ideas that seem to be underexplored”

Fundamental Justification

It looks like some important topics are underexplored in EA and it is good to point on them.

What outcomes were to be expected before you started the project? What were unusually good and unusually bad possible outcomes? (Please avoid hindsight bias and take the interests of all sentient beings into account.)

unusually good outcome: I get funding to start a research center working on this topics and they become art of mainstream in EA and humanity

Good outcome: people become more aware about the topics and some of the get funding for additional research.

Unusually bad possible outcome: the discussion of the topics will be banned.

What actual outcomes are you aware of?

Likes and comments.

Who can make a legitimate claim to a fraction of the impact, and have you talked to them?

I am a sole author of this list of causes. The articles linked in the post are not part of this certificate.

Who are the current owners of the impact and what fraction do they each own?

Procedural Questions

What is your minimum valuation under which you’ll not sell any shares in your impact?

250 USD

What would you have done had there been no chance to get retro funding? (This helps us assess our impact but has no effect on our evaluation of the certificate’s impact.)

I still would do this work as it is my altruistic goal to help humanity.

What can we improve about this process?