New cooperation mechanism - quadratic funding without a matching pool

The article: “New cooperation mechanism - quadratic funding without a matching pool”

Fundamental Justification

What positive impact did you expect before you started the project? What were unusually good and unusually bad possible outcomes? (Please avoid hindsight bias and take the interests of all sentient beings into account.)

I hope this method (or it's future iterations) to become useful for solving dangerous cooperation problems between powerful agents. Here is a more detailed justification.

What actual outcomes are you aware of?

Two people already contacted me, who consider implementing this method in their funding systems.

Who can make a legitimate claim to a fraction of the impact, and have you talked to them?

Who are the current owners of the impact and what fraction do they each own?

100% me

Procedural Questions

What is your minimum valuation under which you’ll not sell any shares in your impact?

What would you have done had there been no chance to get retro funding? (This helps us assess our impact but has no effect on our evaluation of the certificate’s impact.)

I would have done the same, because I found out about this funding after I wrote the post.

What can we improve about this process?